Friday, June 6, 2025

Joy in Repetition - Finishing Maigret

Some people climb mountains. Some people run marathons. I’ve just finished reading all 75 Maigret novels by Georges Simenon — and honestly, I feel like I’ve done a bit of both.

It’s a strange kind of achievement, reading your way through a series of books that, by a lot of measures, are more or less the same. Same protagonist, most of tthe hem in the same streets of postwar Paris, same grimy cafés and sullen suspects (having said that, the weather changes; it may be possible to group the novels into Spring and Autumn novels more effectively than by decade). The motive may be singular, but the tune is familiar. And this of course is the point. There’s a real pleasure to be found in stories that return you to the same world over and over again — not despite their similarities, but because of them.

It’s not a series you rush through. I read them slowly, over years, helped by the fact that Singapore's public library had most of them available either as hard copies or e-books. Sometimes months passed between books. Other times, I’d read two or three in a week. But every time I returned, it felt like I was visiting someone I knew.

Some of the books stand out more than others. The Yellow Dog is pure atmosphere — a seaside town, a mysterious animal, and a fog that never quite lifts. Maigret and the Minister dips into politics and the anxiety of power. Night at the Crossroads is one of the strangest, most noirish entries — full of fog, confusion, and a wonderfully murky sense of place. Maigret and the Good People of Montparnasse finds the Inspector moving through bourgeois respectability with his usual quiet skepticism. And Maigret in Vichy, another one of the later novels, is a beautiful change of pace — Maigret on medical leave, watching the world instead of pursuing it, a man slowly becoming aware of his own mortality. At the same time, I'd be lying if I could remember all of them: the titles Maigret is Afraid and Maigret's Failure don't ring too many bells.

But part of the enjoyment is that even the “minor” entries are enjoyable. They don’t need to be materpieces. They just need to be Maigret.

Reading all 75 books isn’t about chasing a plot or unlocking a twist. It’s about spending time in a world where human frailty is treated with sympathy, where justice is important but never theatrical, and where smoking a pipe while thinking things through still feels like a legitimate investigative strategy.

There’s a kind of artistic tradition in this sort of repetition. P.G. Wodehouse’s Blandings Castle stories are essentially variations on a theme — imposters, pig thefts, romantic mix-ups, and Lord Emsworth in a fog. Yasujiro Ozu’s later films all tell the same gentle story: aging parents, dutiful children, life’s quiet disappointments and dignities. We return to them not because we’re surprised, but because they offer a sense of rhythm, of familiarity, and of quiet beauty in the expected.

Simenon understood that. He once said he didn’t care for plot, really — he was interested in people. That’s what the Maigret novels are: 75 variations on human weakness and quiet understanding, all wrapped in a fog of tobacco and red wine.

And when you turn the last page of the last book, it’s not a grand finale. It’s more like a quiet goodbye at the end of another long walk in the rain.

Monday, May 19, 2025

Tasmania: Land of Led Zeppelin Album Covers

 

I took this photo when I was on holiday in Tasmania about 8 years ago. It's taken from the boat cruise off of Bruny Island and I reckon it would have been a pretty good Led Zeppelin album cover, maybe between Houses of the Holy and Physical Graffiti.  

Sunday, May 4, 2025

Denim & Leather by Michael Hann

In 1978,  Heavy rock had a certain look and sound. Open chords rang out. Musicians might wear silk or Spandex. Kimonos were not unknown. But by 1983, things were different, and what we now call Heavy Metal was set. Denim or Biker jackets, leather trousers, studded wristbands, and palm-muted riffs. The music got faster and a group of fans dispersed in unfashionable towns had became a tribe. Michael Hann's Denim and Leather is a history of the years that codified Heavy Metal.

You don't actually need to like the NWOBHM to enjoy the book. Reading it feels like flipping through a photo album of a vanished Britain — not the royal weddings and Margaret Thatcher kind, but the one with prefab estates, burned-out Ford Cortinas, and hand-drawn band logos scratched into school desks. Hann takes us back to the early ’80s, to a world where in the North of England bands like the Tygers of Pan Tang played working men’s clubs with sticky carpets and bingo on Tuesdays. There's an especially evocative description of the Marquee Club, complete with Lemmy on the slot machines.

One of then things I enjoyed was its discussion of the importance of Glam on influencing the NWOBHM. Hann’s interviews reveal just how many musicians were turned on by T. Rex and Queen before they ever heard Sabbath or Priest  (the number of future metalheads who cite one of their first singles being Queen’s Seven Seas of Rhye is notable). NWOBHM didn’t emerge out of nowhere — it evolved, often in secret, from teenage glam fans who found distortion. 

That tribal identity was held together not just by the music, but by a scattered but passionate media ecosystem. Kerrang! wasn’t just a magazine; it was a lifeline. The Friday Rock Show on BBC Radio 1, hosted by Tommy Vance, was a weekly communion. And then there was the Monsters of Rock festival at Donington. The description of the first festival is one of the book's highlights, as fan after fan remembers their awe at the size of the crowd and  realizing their were other people jut like them. These were the glue — the things that took a thousand small-town scenes and turned them into a national (and international) movement. And that international point is important, as by the mid 80s, the most important innovate bands were coming from the US and Europe. The New Wave of British Heavy Metal also became the Last Wave.

What Denim & Leather also captures — gently, without judgment — is the inevitable fade. By the mid-’80s, the moment had passed. The bands that didn’t break through disbanded. The music press moved on. Thrash arrived. Glam came back, only now it was American and glossy. The NWOBHM bands who didn’t adapt were relegated to footnotes and second-hand bins. But Hann treats them with respect — not just because they mattered, but because they still do to the people who were there. And to people who maybe missed it the first time but found it later — in old records, fanzines, or forums where people still debate the best Venom record ("In League with Satan").

Tuesday, March 26, 2019

To Disco With Love

I've gone a bit Disco recently.

In part, this was kind of inevitable. After all a lot of the bands I've written about on this blog had their Disco phase, so why shouldn't I have one too? And the truth is, I've always been more than a bit partial to some Disco. I was 10 years old in 1979, and I reckon that you'll find very few people who were that age in that year with free access to a radio and Top of the Pops whose souls aren't momentarily lifted whenever they hear the intro to Funkytown.

But my recent phase has been influenced by David Hamsley's To Disco With Love, a book that  collects together some of the Disco era's album artwork, grouped into different themes (with the mid 70s dominating, there's a lot of golds, browns and sunburnt finishes), The covers are often pretty much as bad as you would expect, but then again, so what? As a Black Sabbath fan, I'm perfectly comfortable with the idea of great music coming with dreadful covers.

And a lot of it was great. Chic and Giorgio Moroder get a lot of the attention these days, but at the moment I prefer the mid 70s period: less glitter more strings plus a sprinkle of high camp (which, let's face it, gave flavour to most of the great pop from the 70s). Disco's borders with Funk and soul were pretty porous, and the book finds space for Kool & the Gang, Philadelphia International and even Ramsey Lewis.


The older I get, the more I like this stuff. And I like it without irony, this is no guilty pleasure, where the Salsoul Orchestra albums are tucked safely away from view. I think it's because it's all upbeat stuff. I find dark and edgy music overrated these days, I'll take the Beach Boys, Stevie Wonder, AC/DC or ABBA any day.

Friday, February 8, 2019

10 Random Thoughts About the Bohemian Rhapsody Film


1 .This whole "Live Aid saved Queen" schtick doesn't wash. They had four hits the previous year (and played two of them during their set). On Now 4, released after the summer of 1984, they're Side 1 Track 1 (Radio Ga Ga): what more scientific proof do you want?  

2. It's hard to think of a pop star who lost their muse so comprehensively. He wrote all of Queen's big hits during the 70s, and then none during the 80s. How do you go from "Killer Queen" to "Man on the Prowl" in 10 years? Conclusion: don't grow a moustache.

3. I can't believe they didn't do the "Ah Mr Ferocious" scene with Sid Vicious.

4. I enjoyed the scenes of them recording A Night at the Opera in the countryside. Somebody should write a book about all the albums that were recorded at various farmsteads during the 70s.

5. Gwilym Lee really was Brian May. I don't think I've ever seen a better resemblance between an actor and a character in a biopic.

6. But Ben Hardy really wasn't Roger Taylor. Roger was a good looking guy, but in the film he looks like a squad member of the 1974 West Germany World Cup team.

7.  I have a slight suspicion that one of the motivations of the band for making this film was to get back at Paul Prenter.

8. The film has John Deacon as being about halfway between Derek Smalls and Balderick and I think this is a bit unlikely. I can't imagine he took too much nonsense from the others after "Another One Bites the Dust".

9. There's a scene where Brian May is taking the band through We Will Rock you and Freddie walks in. With a moustache. In 1977! This is madness. If you're going to be paying so much attention to detail that you make sure that he wears the right brand of trainers, you shouldn't be making these errors. 1977!

10. It's a pretty good film, and I speak as someone whose heart sank like a stone when I heard that they were making it.